We'll talk about "zhao4 ben3 shan" king "place" skit problem. Said the problem I think because of should put the evaluation in the art world skit zhao4 ben3 shan status and evaluation for every one of the more specific europeanize works separately. Zhao4 ben3 shan "sketch king who is appointed" status? I think is certainly not CCTV appointed, CCTV is continuous twenty years cctv1 let zhao4 ben3 shan stage play an essay, according to the audience's vote, awarded him the most popular program awards, only this, to consider CCTV appointed for sketch king, this zhao4 ben3 shan is absurd judgment. So, zhao4 ben3 shan "sketch king" title come from? Accurately saying is from the audience, the audience is the most authoritative judges. Of course the audience evaluation also think differently, there is no absolute accuracy and inaccurate, you accept followed guys shout together, do not accept watch his show that doesn't matter. No matter whether "sketch king" zhao4 ben3 shan, we first put aside not to argue about, but having a bit is probably an objective existence, who also negative, that is zhao4 ben3 shan is China sketch session of a few stars one. He in 20 years of career, really is filled with many fine arts, as his host, BTV cooperation with the sketch "yesterday, today, tomorrow", "white clouds, the black earth," and with the cooperation of many other works BTV, deserves to sketch the high-quality goods in, to the Chinese people bring countless laughter.
As for the past spring night zhao4 ben3 shan sketch quality declines, much less than before, this I also have the same feeling. I think it is very normal, with our expectation, hope zhao4 ben3 shan speak each work can become high-quality goods, but that is impossible. Including literature, music and all the famous zai, which can do his work every item is a high-quality goods? Since other artists is such, does not allow zhao4 ben3 shan several wering product even defective goods? I think he work quality declining reason is very complex, and is not a simple zhao4 ben3 shan: as an actor performance aspects of the problem, this study after another. But have a bit, if because zhao4 ben3 shan nearly two years of program quality declines spring evening, then negate zhao4 ben3 shan in sketch circles of artistic status, this may be a vast audience unacceptable, and as such logic to evaluate artist, nor dialectical materialism and historical materialist analysis the scientific attitude.
We say again about MaDong "braved public thao thao bristle", annual cctv1 let zhao4 ben3 shan stage. What is MaDong inverse public opinion and do it, or XiaoYing groundless words carelessly? To answer this question, the key is how to treat the audience of works of art is controversial problems. Any one piece of art works appear dispute is very normal things, because the evaluation are hard to find any art objective uniform standard, any works of art, it is impossible to make all the audience, readers to completely consistent evaluation. Especially CCTV cctv1, it is facing the several million viewers from occupational group, see have workers, farmers, soldiers, teachers, the cadres and enterprise management personnel, etc; From age liking to centenarians, down to a few years old child, In the minority on look, national 56 ethnic groups, many foreign friends are from the cultural degree have experts and professors and illiteracy, etc. If a big constitute a complex group to evaluate the same gala, same program, can have no dispute? No dispute is not normal. XiaoYing speak his opinion is not personal, represents the academic experts, then, the educational expert advice is completely consistent?
In CCTV held two years a session of QingGeSai, dozens of judges is national first-class specialists, but frequency very highlands appear such phenomenon: dozens of judges of the same singers evaluation with song, the highest and lowest points of extraordinary disparity, this how to look at this phenomenon? If the CCTV also please XiaoYing professor to do the judges, and he too disparity, he is to other judges attack? Like cctv1 such a entertaining party, not was necessary, would not be studied theoretically a set of evaluation of each program quality objective standard to, say, see only objective standard audience appeal. Audience rating can only take majority and minority to difference, but cannot simply look have against. Whereas most and minority and must use data to speak, whose programs as long as the support of the majority, in the similar programs in the highest ratings, whose programs, so that the most excellent selection is indubitable. CCTV is according to such a simple and scientific method, selected in each time the audience favourite programmes, but zhao4 ben3 shan are audience dubbed the sketch king, year after year on cctv1, it was also the mechanism are created, it is the meaning. Cannot because zhao4 ben3 shan nearly two years, the audience decline skit quality approval rating dropped, again let him on stage is "tao tao braved the bristle, year after year with his' sketch king 'hat."
Including this year spring night zhao4 ben3 shan "Jane's you", I also not satisfied, also can feel many viewers this programs are not satisfied. From the result of CCTV panel, really see this show zhao4 ben3 shan of scale and his program approval rating dropped a lot, but this year's sketch program compared, "Jane's you" are still the highest award, so still is worthy.
No comments:
Post a Comment